Advisory · Consulting · Optimisation · Platform

Margin in logistics and supply chain,
proven in numbers.

From an independent reading of the asset to the software that runs the decision every day. Four fronts, one engine — across rail, ports, terminals and the chain that depends on them. The gain is measured against a written baseline, not an estimate.

  • Diagnostic and measured baseline
  • Operations engineering consulting
  • Network, fleet and terminal optimisation
  • Multi-year capex and inventory
  • ERP/EAM and inspection integration
  • Auditable proof of gain
≈ 30,000 km

Approximate extent of the Brazilian railway network in operation

Public sector data (ANTT and Ministry of Transport), compiled Aug 2026

BRL 240.8 bn

Potential investment mapped from railway authorisation requests

ANTT, 2022 — 79 authorisation requests filed

≈ 380

Port facilities operating in Brazil, between private terminals and leased concessions

ANTAQ, public data compiled Aug 2026

20.7% → 45%

Rail share of the freight matrix: current base and official long-term target

Ministry of Transport — National Logistics Plan

Figures on this site come from public sources, with year and assumption stated. Headway does not publish client gain ranges without a measured, written baseline, and does not name clients, corridors or results without authorisation.

The thesis

Maintenance decisions do not fail for lack of prediction. They fail from an excess of candidates.

On any network there are more segments asking for intervention than there is budget, crew and window to serve them. The queue is ordered by apparent urgency, history and internal negotiation — and the cost of that is never calculated.

Predicting failure helps, but does not settle it: a predictive system returns the same list of risks when the budget changes. What changes the decision is the next layer — the one that ranks interventions under real constraints of budget, window and criticality, proposes where to start and explains why.

That layer is what Headway builds, together with two things it presupposes and that almost never exist ready-made: maintenance data reconciled into a single asset model, and the measurement methodology that turns a result into a number both parties accept.

About

Who we work for

Four profiles, one method

Freight concessionaires

Mature networks and greenfield alike: material maintenance budgets and simultaneous pressure on availability and cost. The problem is rarely a lack of prediction — it is an excess of candidates for the same window.

Track · Fleet · windows and capacity

Bulk terminals and ports

A series loading line, where one link stopping stops the whole chain — and the cost is not the repair: it is the vessel waiting and the train held at the gate.

Terminal · rail–terminal interface · proof of gain

Operators with their own assets

Mining and industry with dedicated track, fleet and terminal, where logistics is a means rather than an end — and the maintenance budget competes with productive investment.

Track · Terminal · fleet cycle

Investors and boards

Those who need an independent reading of a railway asset and of what its maintenance plan actually sustains in capacity over the coming years.

Diagnostic · capacity reading · proof of gain

What we do

Eight lines of work

All services
01

Headway Diagnóstico

Measures the baseline on data the client already has, sizes the opportunity with explicit assumptions, and delivers the business case that supports — or kills — the pilot.

02

Track maintenance optimisation

Ranks inspection, tamping, grinding and component renewal by risk and operational criticality, within the budget and the windows the operation actually has.

03

Rolling stock optimisation

Treats the fleet as a system: prioritises critical components, sequences the workshop by effect on availability and sizes the spare parts stock that sustains the plan.

04

Bulk terminal optimisation

Treats the terminal as the series line it is: critical equipment ranked by throughput impact, with the intervention window matched to the vessel line-up and train arrivals.

05

Maintenance windows and capacity

The window is the scarce resource. Allocates interventions against the real circulation grid and translates maintenance into capacity: headway, transit time and volume.

06

Maintenance data integration

Brings ERP/EAM, inspection cars, testing, telemetry and field records into a single asset model — with the history reconciled, not merely transported.

07

Rail–terminal interface

The wagon cycle does not end at the destination yard. Measures arrival, shunting, positioning, loading and release with the same ruler used for track time.

08

Proof of value

The methodology that fixes baseline, source, exclusions, window and committee before any measurement. Without it, a variable fee becomes a dispute instead of trust.

How we deliver

From diagnostic to proven gain

Approach

A paid diagnostic, a controlled pilot with a written baseline, proof in a joint committee, and only then implementation and annual licence. No free pilots.

01

Baseline before any projection

The baseline is measured on the client’s own data and agreed in writing before work starts. Without it there is no number — only an estimate with decimal places.

02

Explainability and abstention

Every recommendation carries a rationale and a confidence level. Below the threshold, the system states that it does not recommend, rather than issuing a weak output that looks strong.

03

Joint validation committee

The measured gain is approved by a committee formed by client and Headway, with audit rights on both sides over methodology and data.

Next step

How much of your maintenance budget is well allocated?

The conversation starts with the problem, not the platform: which decision is made today without enough data, and what the order of magnitude would be if it improved. Thirty minutes, no corporate deck.

Talk to a partner contato@headwaylog.com.br

Reply within one business day